Submissions

Author Guidelines

Authors are invited to submit manuscripts to this experimental academic website. This platform provides a fully automated AI-powered review process designed to deliver fast, standardized, and independent feedback on scholarly work in Economics, Sociology, Political Science, and related social science disciplines.

Submission and Review Process

1. After completing the submission process, authors pay the review fee (which covers AI processing costs plus a platform fee 10EUR).
2. The manuscript is then sent to an AI system for evaluation. The diagram for processing manuscripts is presented here. During the initial analysis, queries to external data sources are prepared. External data sources: semanticscholar.org, openalex.org, consensus.app. External data is submitted for final analysis along with the manuscript. As a result the AI provides a structured review consisting of:
   • Numeric scores on key parameters (Originality/Novelty, Significance/Contribution, Methodological Rigor, Clarity of Presentation, Relevance etc).
   • Critical assessment.
   • Advisory recommendations for improvement.
3. A composite review rating (percentage) is calculated and provided to the author.
4. Only the author decides whether to publish the work on the website.
5. If the author chooses to publish:
   • Manuscripts with a review rating equal to or above the predefined threshold and have two or more reviews are published with full public access.
   • Manuscripts below the threshold and less than two reviews are published with restricted access (visible only to registered and logged-in users) and visually marked as “restricted publication”.

Note: The first three works published by any author undergo additional manual checking by the website administrator before appearing online.

Authors may revise and resubmit their manuscript as many times as they wish based on the AI feedback.

Before Submission

Authors are responsible for:

• Obtaining permission to publish any material included with the submission (photos, documents, datasets, etc.).
• Ensuring all authors listed on the submission consent to be identified as authors.
• Securing appropriate ethics committee approval where required, in accordance with the legal requirements of the study’s country.

This platform does not perform traditional editorial desk rejection. However, submissions that are clearly unsuitable (e.g., incomplete, off-topic, or of extremely low quality) may still be returned or rejected by the administrator.

Post-publication: Reader Reviews.

Once a work has been published, qualified users can leave a peer-review (Reader Review). A user is considered qualified if they have more than two full-open available publications. Reader reviews are displayed on the work's page. A Reader Rating is calculated based on these reviews and is also displayed on the page.

Disclaimer

The views, findings, and conclusions expressed in articles published on this platform are solely those of the individual authors and do not represent the official policy, position, or endorsement of the platform or its affiliated institutions. The platform does not guarantee the accuracy, validity, or reliability of the research data presented and assumes no legal responsibility or liability for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this content.